Saturday, April 30, 2011

Big Damn Heroes


If life is a battle, then my inner scars are medals for valor, for swiftness, for courage, for passion. Evil is the dark-haired brother of Good; they walk hand in hand–always.
Calanthe - Wraeththu

What is Chivalry? A knight was expected to have not only the strength and skills to face combat in the violent Middle Ages but was also expected to temper this aggressive side of a fighter with a chivalrous side to his nature. There was not an authentic Knights Code of Chivalry as a prescribed document - it was a moral system which went beyond rules of combat and introduced the concept of Chivalrous conduct - qualities such as bravery, courtesy, honor, and gallantry toward women. Documented in 'The Song of Roland' in the Middle Ages Knights period of William the Conqueror who ruled England from 1066, it consisted of these tenents -

To fear God and maintain His Church
To serve the liege lord in valour and faith
To protect the weak and defenceless
To give succour to widows and orphans
To refrain from the wanton giving of offence
To live by honour and for glory
To despise pecuniary reward
To fight for the welfare of all
To obey those placed in authority
To guard the honour of fellow knights
To eschew unfairness, meanness and deceit
To keep faith
At all times to speak the truth
To persevere to the end in any enterprise begun
To respect the honour of women
Never to refuse a challenge from an equal
Never to turn the back upon a foe


The "code" is written in slightly different form in different pieces of literature, but it all has these things in common - courage, loyalty, respect, honor, finishing everything you start and never refusing a necessary battle regardless of the odds.

Widows and orphans were cared for. In days of old, the helpless were looked after, but you worked or you did not eat. There were three orders in society: oratores (those who pray), bellatores (those who fight), and laborares (those who work). Those that prayed, lived beyond simply, not riding around in limos in $1500 suits while telling their followers on national TV to "send more money". The welfare class, that's rapidly becoming a huge chunk of our "modern" society, didn't exist. If you were physically capable, you pulled your weight. Or you died. The knight did not fight for the lazy, but for those who by station, age, or gender were not able to fight for themselves.

There was faith in a higher power, but not so heavenly driven, that a man was useless on earth.


A sword was a tool, to defend and protect. Lesser weapons were considered dishonorable. The dagger was considered a weapon of a sneaky assassin and an arbalest (fired from a distance) was a brutal weapon used by the untrained. A knight's code of chivalry demanded that he face his enemy openly, honestly and with skill - it was a "let the best man win" situation. Battle was more than the desire to pursue and kill, but endurance, the conviction and longing to endure beyond all imaginable limits of the flesh to protect and preserve.

There was a difference between aggression and self defense, a difference between being devoted to justice and being a school yard bully. It is a self-awareness and self-restraint and differs as night and day from apathy, the concept of which Christians might refer to as meekness, a trait often associated with Christ, and clearly as misunderstood.

There was the ability to think before one speaks, to consider the gravity of words and actions; and even to know when inaction or silence is the best avenue. Such things, many, including myself, have failed at. Such things we can still strive for. There was bravely standing up for friends, not just ourselves.



The dictates of chivalry are not some formal guide to etiquette. I hope I die before I see a "Chivalry for Dummies" book. It's not a checklist, it's an understanding of things for which a man needs no checklist. It's not bowing before your nation's enemy, it's never turning your backs on them. It's not holding the door open for a women because she's weak and lesser than you, but as a sign of courtesy. It's a way of thinking, not an era or a specific rule.

I've written on this blog more than once about the wimpification of the modern male. But being a strong man does not mean you are completely closed off to emotion, treating sex like an oil change, and a woman as a somewhat lesser accessory. The strongest man I know can convey in one look, one touch, what I mean to him. But one can understand where the mixed signals come from. The view from the media is one of abject consumerism, relationships that manipulate, sex as control and the worst "if there's a man involved, it's his fault". Our nation has more material comforts than the knights could ever imagine, but for many people, it's prosperity without purpose, it's passion without principles.


People espouse the Middle Ages as being little more than Pestilence, Black Death and no YouTube with the concepts of that day being outdated, or worse, by their own basis, misogynistic. What do we have now to replace it? Materialism without ethics or effort, and baby daddy's, greedy trophy wives, teen moms, and uncouth, plastic infused bimbos who get their own reality TV shows without any bit of skill or talent. This is our alternative to "the Dark Ages", a generation of people who fail to understand the difference between "can" and "should"?

Epictetus said it best "for it is better to die of hunger, exempt from fear and guilt, than to live in affluence with perturbation."

But the spirit of chivalry has not been entirely eradicated from the human heart, even in our pacifist, feminist, age. A chivalrous man today is a warrior with something to live for - and is willing to sacrifice his life either to protect or further it. Being a warrior does not not necessarily make him a man of war, but a man prepared to do battle for that which he loves. The battle can be one of ideology, not weapons, his life simply marked by preparation for something worthwhile, and thus is lived pursuing those ideals and interests which for him hold true value.

If this man is willing to die for something he loves, it is because he loves deeply and with great passion. Romantic love may well make the short list, but it's not the sole occupant of his soul, there are other causes and objects of a man's passion, that make him truly rounded.

Chivalry is not dead, it is simply dormant in many, for all things that are excellence can be as difficult as they are rare. In my writing I've referred to the knight as he, for it was a manly profession. Yet the ideas that define chivalry know no gender; it's a way of thinking expressed in form by both men and women who hold true these concepts of defense and accountability.

Some will call me hopefully old fashioned. Feminist and those more liberal minded will decry it as a way of life that is simply bloodshed, war and women seen as a possession. It's not. A chivalrous man, has no desire to control and direct a woman's thoughts, but to allow her to live without constraint, loved unconditionally, free from pesky dragons and telemarketers. He will not only arm himself with the tools he as to protect her, he will smile when she takes up her own. He will fight for her. He will fight with her.

Chivalry is NOT dead. Look at our military personnel, look at those people who responded after the terror attacks. Firemen, EMT's, the police. Nurses, doctors. A post-September 11 nation's no place for milquetoasts. We are living in a fallen world with entire societies that wish us harm, religions of "peace" that dictate to embrace them or die. This is not a time to sit home watching reality television, when the dragons aren't just bigger, they're almost nuclear ready.

It's a time for heroes. Big Damn Heroes.

In the Battle of Maldon, a few Englishmen have been attacked by a fierce army of Viking invaders. Although the Vikings are between two branches of the river and thus separated from launching their full strength at the Anglo-Saxon army, Beortnoth nobly allows them free passage to do battle on equal terms. Vastly outnumbered, Beortnoth and his brave men are slain until only a small, unflinching band of warriors remain:

“Byorthwold spoke; he grasped his shield; he was an old companion; he shook his ash spear; full boldly he exhorted the warriors: 'Thought shall be the harder, heart the keener, courage the greater, as our might lessens. Here lies our leader all hewn down, the valiant man in the dust; may he lament for ever who thinks now to turn from this war-play. I am old in age; I will not hence, but I purpose to lie by the side of my lord. . ."

In these few words, a better description of heroism, of unwavering dedication and loyalty I've not read in a while. The lines “Thought shall be the harder, heart the keener, courage the greater, as our might lessens" are a thousand years old, a pre Christian heroic spirit which author J.R. Tolkien, a crafter of worlds where chivalry roared, himself called "Northernness".

Chivalry exists, and heroism stands. Look at the people who serve in hard times, hard areas, death a shadow on the wall, so the masses can be safe. But you don't have to be a member of the military or a protector of the weak to embrace these concepts. Chivalry gives us something to strive for, something to hold up as an ideal and an understanding that throughout history there are those who have risen above the standards of the day to truly be called brave.

The year could be 1066, it could be 2001, it could be today. A hand on a rough shovel, flinging the dirt with an effortless fury, the mound of soil rising of its own volition, not crafted by man but as if flung forth by the earth itself, until the grave is readied. A warrior has fallen, medals scribed on ore or heart, small things insignificant to the view, but mute with profound meaning. The earth waits but a moment. Shadows fall with the moon's curve, no sound but the labored breath of form of one who engaged without arms, this single combat. Laying a warrior to rest.

There is now but a shield to be picked up and carried on. So, man or woman, we never forget.

37 comments:

Rev. Paul said...

Once again, you've spoken great and deep truths with an eloquence few have equaled. May the men who now call themselves "patriots" strive for the goals our ancestors embraced willingly. And may we succeed, else there is no reason to strive.

Tango Juliet said...

Very good Brigid! Very, very good!

Tango Juliet said...

“Chivalry!---why, maiden, she is the nurse of pure and high affection---the stay of the oppressed, the redresser of grievances, the curb of the power of the tyrant ---Nobility were but an empty name without her, and liberty finds the best protection in her lance and her sword.” -- Sir Walter Scott

Island Bob said...

Jeff Cooper wrote "Ride, shoot straight and speak the truth."


Saw something I never heard of on a shooting forum today. Today is the anniversary of the Battle of Camorone and the tale of Captain Danjou and the sixty Legionaires. 30April 1863. Helluva story. If interested Google it; you may find it interesting.

quizikle said...

Ah, Brigid. A rare wanderer through our times.

I am indeed blessed to experience knowledge and wisdom through your words.

Matt said...

You are truly a gifted Bard.

I am learning that many are willing to die for a cause but few are willing to suffer for a cause. Many are willing to be persecuted for their beliefs, but not fight for them. They are willing to die, but not go to prison, lose their jobs, status, or comfortable life.

Jim_Pickering said...

Ever read "Goodbye Mickey Mouse" by Len Deighton? With your interests in aviation, you might find it quite interesting.

Enjoy your postings. Hope you continue with them.

Six said...

"Blessed are the pure in heart for they will see God."

You continue to amaze and move me Brigid.

Brock Townsend said...

Good one and posted.

Hat Trick said...

An excellent post.

I fear that very few of our younger generations have any concept of chivalry.

dennisranch said...

Perhaps the best posting on a blog I have ever read!

Murphy's Law said...

Bravo!

Shepherd K said...

"A chivalrous man, has no desire to control and direct a woman's thoughts, but to allow her to live without constraint, loved unconditionally, free from pesky dragons and telemarketers. He will not only arm himself with the tools he as to protect her, he will smile when she picks up her own. He will fight for her. He will fight with her."

I couldn't have said it better myself, and I think The Queen would agree that that summarizes my attitude towards her.

Mrs. S. said...

And here's to the ordinary, every day chivalrous gentleman who opens doors for a ladies. Thank you.

Thankfully, it isn't necessary to storm castles on a daily basis as that can be very exhausting. Sometimes just taking out the trash is enough. However, if you want to do it with style, get out the trebuchet, and don't forget the super heavy duty trash bags.

Cond0010 said...

"A chivalrous man, has no desire to control and direct a woman's thoughts, but to allow her to live without constraint,..."

That is the essence of Judeo/Christianity. All relationships are voluntary and that no one should be coerced or manipulated in those realms. Even our Judeo/Christian God makes his relationship with us voluntary -all the way back to Eden with Adam and Eve. Its not until the vow is spoken that a relationship beocmes an occupation to be maintained with another that there is a permanent bond (well... until you depart from the world, of course).

"Beortnoth and his brave men are slain until only a small, unflinching band of warriors remain..."

...and yet in the mind of God, they remain.

"The year could be 1066, it could be 2001, it could be today. "

Technology changes, but man and his struggles remain the same.

Beautifully written, Brigid.

From what I have read, the Dark Ages were not actually dark, but a time of great faith and compassion. It was a secular historian (the name escapes me at the moment) who had coined the term 'Dark Ages' and it has continued to be maligned in that fashion to this day. But we are in the era of the Secular Humanist.

Good in some respects. Not so good in others.

Thank you, Brigid. This kind of writing is like Meat and Milk to me. Very sustaining. I await the next installment patiently... :)

I'd like to echo what Six has said:

"Blessed are the pure in heart for they will see God."

Your sight seems clear in this matter.

Priest said...

A beautiful piece Brigid. I think it's interesting to note that almost every Culture that succeeded at transforming itself into a Civilization has sought to give its warriors some sort of Code to live by that provided for protecting those weaker than themselves. A Warrior may discipline his Mind and Body to the business of killing men, but if he has no means of Governing his Spirit he has no reason to endure.

Cond0010 said...

"A Warrior may discipline his Mind and Body to the business of killing men, but if he has no means of Governing his Spirit he has no reason to endure.

Fantastic Quote, Priest. Governance of the spririt. Yes. Worthy to practice not just with the warriors, but for the "oratores" and "laborares" in their occupational pursuits as well.

That is going in my quote archive.

Peter said...

Thanks for writing this, Brigid. You made me think very hard: and when I'd thought, I wrote my response, to remember my own heroes. It's far too long to put here, so I posted it on my own blog:

http://bayourenaissanceman.blogspot.com/2011/04/my-heroes.html

I hope it speaks to you, as your post spoke to me.

Thanks again.

Keads said...

Again you have stirred me to respond with my limited skills in this manner of media.

You said "A chivalrous man today is a warrior with something to live for - and is willing to sacrifice his life either to protect or further it. Being a warrior does not not necessarily make him a man of war, but a man prepared to do battle for that which he loves. The battle can be one of ideology, not weapons, his life simply marked by preparation for something worthwhile, and thus is lived pursuing those ideals and interests which for him hold true value."

I fight a war of both ideology and weapons. To me now this is my passion. I have never sought to control another. I would much rather have a true partner. I would never subjugate another to my whims. I have made choices in my life recently that will cause some economic hardship for me but I could no longer be a part of that system.

I will defend. Some have asked "Why are you doing this? You have no children, little family left and they are old and feeble. Why do you continue on the path of non-conformist?" Why is there no one in your life? This is spoken by some and inferred by others. I am sure you get the same.

My answer is I have no choice. A partner may come, but for now I am totally happy to teach others both as you note "ideology and weapons". I get to do both! This is a great gift for me, and one only recently found. It is my passion for as you say, it is not going to be any easier from here on out.

Great post young lady!

Guffaw in AZ said...

Brigid - I posted a link first to you, and then Paul's homage.
I'd nothing to say of import after reading you both.
God Bless.
gfa

Vernon said...

I think the time is rapidly approaching where the only choices we will have in life are the ones illustrated in the "Firefly" clip. Those being, join the crowd (actively or passively), step up to the platform and say "light it", or take up arms and be the "big damn heroes".
p.s. does anyone know how to make that clip show up in a Firefox browser in Linux?

The Old Man said...

Beauty! Had to link to these words.
Thanks.


(BTW - Under "Recipes" in the right sidebar? I think Lazarus said "flavor" not "flower".)

Mike said...

Brigid,

Wonderfully written, as always. I have observed that respecting anothers boundaries, and being polite (please and thank you) seem to be in short supply. Yet, these are sorely needed.

SWModel66

idahobob said...

Thank you, again, for another wonderful and beautiful post.

May the younger members of our society, read this and learn.

Bob
III

Ed Rasimus said...

A hat tip, Brigid. Bravo Zulu and Sierra Hotel.

Joseph said...

Well Said.

Chivalry still exists, but is often criticized when practiced. "Not getting involved" and a sense of entitlement without effort has replaced much of it.

For most, but not for all.

trailbee said...

I came by way of Bayou Renaissance Man's link. What a post! Thank you so much. Biene

Blue said...

Manners

Honesty

Integrity

Courage

Doing the right thing, no matter what others think.

Some of us were fortunate in having good role models. Fathers, mothers, relatives.

Excellent post, Brigid :)

Old NFO said...

WOW... Great one Brigid! Thank you!

Mick Havoc said...

Well done!

I am going to share your profound thoughts with my sons. I cannot say it any better.

Rynn said...

As a student of the Bible, I saw your mention of meekness. It's been my pleasure to teach that meekness means strength under control. True religion is protection of the fatherless and the widow. Most Christians have the wrong definition for both terms. It never dawned on me that Chivalry is the same thing. I think it is the perfect definition for both.

You have blessed me with a deeper understanding, and a new blog to visit. I came by way of BayouRM.

Take care....

Alan von Altendorf said...

Respectful admiration and thanks. Best statement of moral philosophy I've ever read.

Leslie said...

Honor, Courage, Commitment...Chivalry.

frank505 said...

Helga the Viking Fire Princess and keeper of all things buffalo is in agreement and I also. Thank you for all you do for us, we appreciate it beyond words.

The Group Guy said...

Your writing is splendid and your command of language in articulating core beliefs is impressive.

The Group Guy said...

Very impressive writing.

LES said...

followed this over from Dennis Ranch blog........glad I did...awesome commentary as well as a great blog site...I'll be back